<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<package xmlns="http://www.idpf.org/2007/opf" unique-identifier="uuid_id" version="2.0">
    <metadata xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:opf="http://www.idpf.org/2007/opf">
        <dc:identifier opf:scheme="calibre" id="calibre_id">639</dc:identifier>
        <dc:identifier opf:scheme="uuid" id="uuid_id">9ee0a68c-1c90-43ff-baa1-da76b3b6ce49</dc:identifier>
        <dc:title>Colonialism and its others Considerations</dc:title>
        <dc:creator opf:file-as="Narayan, Uma" opf:role="aut">Uma Narayan</dc:creator>
        <dc:contributor opf:file-as="calibre" opf:role="bkp">calibre (7.1.0) [https://calibre-ebook.com]</dc:contributor>
        <dc:date>1995-03-12T23:00:00+00:00</dc:date>
        <dc:description>&lt;div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Abstract:&lt;/strong&gt; I point to a colonial care discourse that enabled colonizers to define themselves in relationship to “inferior” colonized subjects. The colonized, however, had very different accounts of this relationship. While contemporary care discourse correctly insists on ackwledging humn needs and relationship, it needs to worry about who defines these often contested terms. 1 conclude that improvements dong dimensions of care and of justice often provide “enabling conditions” fur each other. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</dc:description>
        <dc:publisher>Hypatia</dc:publisher>
        <dc:language>en</dc:language>
        <dc:subject>piratecareintroduction</dc:subject>
        <meta name="calibre:timestamp" content="2024-12-19T18:22:10+00:00"/>
        <meta name="calibre:title_sort" content="Colonialism and its others Considerations"/>
    </metadata>
    <guide>
        <reference type="cover" title="Cover" href="cover.jpg"/>
    </guide>
</package>
